Suggested Topics within your search.
Suggested Topics within your search.
klimatické zmeny
2
Exclude matching results
climate changes
1
Exclude matching results
dezinformácie
1
Exclude matching results
disinformation
1
Exclude matching results
ecology
1
Exclude matching results
ekológia
1
Exclude matching results
environment
1
Exclude matching results
environmentálne povedomie
1
Exclude matching results
environmentálne problémy
1
Exclude matching results
globálne otepľovanie
1
Exclude matching results
globálne problémy životného prostredia
1
Exclude matching results
politické aspekty
1
Exclude matching results
prírodné zdroje
1
Exclude matching results
trvalo udržateľný rozvoj
1
Exclude matching results
štatistika životného prostredia
1
Exclude matching results
životné prostredie
1
Exclude matching results
Bjørn Lomborg

In 2002, Lomborg and the Environmental Assessment Institute founded the Copenhagen Consensus. In 2004, he was listed as one of ''Time's'' 100 most influential people.
In his subsequent book, ''Cool It'' (2007), and its film adaptation, Lomborg outlined his views on global warming, many of which contradict the scientific consensus on climate change. These views include the claim that the negative impacts are overstated and the opinion that too much emphasis is put on climate change mitigation at the expense of climate change adaptation. Lomborg agrees that global warming is real and man-made and will have a serious impact but enumerates other disagreements with the scientific consensus. In 2009, ''Business Insider'' cited Lomborg as one of "The 10 Most-Respected Global Warming Skeptics".
Lomborg's views and work have attracted scrutiny from the scientific community. He was formally accused of scientific misconduct over the book ''The Skeptical Environmentalist''. The Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (DSCD) concluded in an evaluation of the book that "one couldn't prove that Lomborg had deliberately been scientifically dishonest, although he had broken the rules of scientific practice in that he interpreted results beyond the conclusions of the authors he cited." The Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation criticised the procedural aspects of the DCSD investigation. His positions on climate change have been challenged by experts and characterized as cherry picking. Provided by Wikipedia
-
1
-
2
-
3